Find UConn's journal titles:
Search library databases to find citations:
"I like the way Google Scholar finds books in nearby libraries." Yes, but . . .
If you like this feature, then check out a library database called WorldCat. It does the same thing, but it includes many more useful items, gives more complete descriptions, and has easy-to-use yet powerful searches. It is especially useful for finding music. Also, you can request interlibrary loans through WorldCat.
"I like the way Google Scholar finds books at UConn." Yes, but . . .
Google Scholar is convenient (and will improve), but remember that only a fraction of UConn's materials are in Google Scholar. HOMER lists everything. Also, when it comes to music, HOMER has superior search and display capabilities.
"It's great that I can find journal articles and link to the full text." Yes, but . . .
This feature indeed has strong potential and is already useful, but please remember the following:
Articles are NOT free.
UConn has has electronic subscriptions
to some titles. UConn students, faculty, and staff can
access those articles by logging on first at Google
Scholar Login (for UConn's full text)
or working
at an on-campus computer (non-wireless). However, if UConn does
not subscribe, you will not be able to access the article.
UConn's databases have ADDITIONAL full-text articles (not
in Google Scholar).
Google Scholar does NOT list all of UConn's full-text articles.
You WILL miss citations if you only search Google Scholar. Likewise,
Google Scholar may list some of UConn's articles, but links to full-text
articles do not always work, or there may not be any links. Those same
articles may be available through the library's electronic and print
subscriptions. Go to the eJournal Locator and HOMER to look up
specific journal titles. Also search UConn's drama
and music databases to find
hundreds of article citations and links to full
text.
"Google Scholar is so easy. Just type and go." Yes, but . . .
While Google Scholar is attractive in its simplicity, it currently offers no way to focus your search. Ultimately, this wastes your time and keeps you from finding material most suited to your needs. Library databases such as RILM, Music Index, JSTOR, and HOMER (the library catalog) have sophisticated features that allow more precise searching. For example, in RILM you can limit your search by broad classification (e.g., theory, pedagogy, or history), date, or publication type (dissertation, review, book, or article). You can use specialized (standardized) musical terms, search specific fields (e.g., journal title), and display and manipulate information in a variety of ways.
"Google Scholar tells me who else cited this source!" Yes, but . . .
This is a nifty feature (and is often critical in research), but Google Scholar's "Cited By's" are startlingly incomplete. Specialized library databases find significantly more "cited by" references and have powerful search and display features. (We have not yet compared results to see if Google Scholar finds additional cites.) Here is more information about citation indexes in the arts.
"I love how Google Scholar lists everything all in one place." Yes, but . . .
One-stop shopping sounds great, and the UConn Libraries will someday offer a similar service. Indeed, Google Scholar allows users to search across some full-text databases or sites at once (e.g., JSTOR, Project Muse, and some publisher sites). That is handy, even if the searches are crude. It is also convenient to just "pop into" Google Scholar and run a quick search. This sort of activity can be part of an effective search strategy involving both Google Scholar and subscription databases. Just remember that Google Scholar does not list everything (not even close!), and it may not have the best materials for your needs. Specialized databases are often the better choice for specialized needs.
"I can do all my research with Google Scholar now!" Yes, but . . .
Google Scholar finds some materials that you might not have found otherwise. Still, caveat emptor.
Google Scholar omits many significant
resources.
Google Scholar excludes many
resources (e.g., many full text articles, plus citations to
thousands of additional articles, books, essays, etc.) and
does not indicate what is included (e.g., dates covered,
publishers, etc.). Preliminary tests in the library show
that Google Scholar is NOT retrieving a good amount of
material. Try comparing author and title searches in Google
Scholar and specialized music
databases. The omissions are stunning. See Google Scholar reviews below for more information.
(Google Scholar's scope notes and content will probably improve
over time.)
Google Scholar is just one starting
point.
Google Scholar holds much potential
and may find useful material, but it does NOT replace HOMER
or specialized bibliographic databases. You will miss too
much otherwise. "Relying exclusively on any single source
is not recommended. Rigorous academic research requires
thorough searching across databases, varying your search
strategy to include synonyms and alternate spellings of
keywords, utilizing appropriate subject headings supplied
by the database, and understanding the breadth and depth of
literature indexed by each database. The library's
databases have been carefully selected to provide
comprehensive, retrospective and timely access to scholarly
literature" (from Google
Scholar vs. Library Databases at Oberlin, accessed
December 10, 2004).
Remember:
author: (e.g., author:antokoletz) Add other terms, such as author:antokoletz bartok.
intitle: (e.g., intitle:dreams)
site: (e.g., site:www.lib.uconn.edu) You may need the complete domain name. Also, some information providers have more than one domain name .)
Below are some library services and publishers known to be participating in Google Scholar.
[top]
This page was found at http://www.lib.uconn.edu/music/schoogle.html.